Monday, 26 October 2026

The Coalition Against Corruption and Bad Governance (CACOBAG) has thrown its weight behind the African Action Congress (AAC) and its presidential candidate, Omoyele Sowore, in their request to use the Presidential Villa

The Coalition Against Corruption and Bad Governance (CACOBAG) has thrown its weight behind the African Action Congress (AAC) and its presidential candidate, Omoyele Sowore, in their request to use the Presidential Villa, Aso Rock, Abuja, for the inauguration of the party’s Presidential Campaign Council scheduled for November 11, 2026.

The coalition also condemned the National Secretary of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Senator Ajibola Basiru, for describing Sowore as a “skit maker” and a “political comedian,” describing the remarks as derogatory and undemocratic.

In a press release dated October 22, 2026, and jointly signed by its Chairman, Toyin Raheem, and Secretary, Comrade Idowu Taiwo, CACOBAG said the AAC’s request was legitimate and should be granted without discrimination.

The organisation noted that the request followed the reported use of the State House Conference Centre within the Presidential Villa for the inauguration of the APC Campaign Council on October 14, 2026.

CACOBAG questioned why the ruling party should be allowed to use a facility within the Presidential Villa for its political activities while opposition parties could potentially be denied similar access.

“Does Aso Villa belong to APC? Does it belong to Tinubu personally? No. It belongs to all Nigerians,” the coalition stated, arguing that the facility was built, furnished and maintained with public funds.

According to the group, allowing the ruling party exclusive access to a public facility for political activities could amount to preferential treatment, political discrimination and what it described as attitudinal corruption.

It maintained that the principle of equal treatment should apply to all registered political parties seeking to use public facilities under comparable conditions.

Reacting to Basiru’s description of Sowore as a “skit maker” and “political comedian,” CACOBAG defended the AAC leader’s political activism and criticism of the government.

The coalition argued that speaking truth to power, defending the oppressed, exposing corruption and raising concerns about Nigeria’s development should not be grounds for ridicule.

“If to consistently speak truth to power, to defend the oppressed, to expose corruption and to make valid, patriotic points on the development of Nigeria is to be a political comedian, then yes, Sowore is a political comedian whom Nigerians love and respect,” the statement read.

CACOBAG further claimed that Sowore enjoyed considerable public support because he articulated concerns that many Nigerians were unable to express openly.

The coalition cited Sections 40 and 42 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, in support of its arguments concerning freedom of association and protection against discrimination.

It also referenced Section 95(2) of the Electoral Act 2022, arguing that state apparatus and public facilities should not be used to favour or disadvantage any political party or candidate.

CACOBAG further invoked the constitutional principles that sovereignty belongs to the people and that the security and welfare of citizens should be the primary purpose of government.

The organisation compared Nigeria’s situation with political practices in the United States, the United Kingdom, South Africa and Ghana, arguing that public institutions should not be treated as the private property of ruling parties.

It called on the Nigerian government to uphold fairness and prevent the country from sliding towards a one-party state

CACOBAG also challenged Basiru to advise President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to walk through the streets of Lagos, Iragbiji or Abuja alongside Sowore without security personnel, arguing that such an encounter would reveal their respective levels of public acceptance.

The coalition further alleged that Tinubu would struggle to mobilise genuine public support without monetary inducements, insisting that Nigerians were increasingly demanding systemic change.

It also criticised the administration’s policies, describing them as harsh and anti-people, and recalled warnings attributed to the late elder statesman Pa Ayo Adebanjo ahead of the 2023 general elections.

CACOBAG maintained that extending Tinubu’s tenure for another 20 years would not produce positive outcomes for Nigeria, a position it expressed as part of its broader criticism of the administration.

The coalition outlined three major demands in its statement.

First, it called on the Presidency to grant Sowore and the AAC access to the Presidential Villa for the inauguration of their campaign council without imposing additional conditions.

Second, it demanded that other registered political parties seeking to use the same facility be given equal access under comparable conditions.

Third, it urged Basiru to withdraw his remarks against Sowore and apologise to Nigerian youths and democrats.

Reaffirming its position, CACOBAG declared that the Presidential Villa belongs to all Nigerians and should be administered in a manner that reflects fairness, democratic principles and equal treatment.

Friday, 23 October 2026

ADC Alimosho Raises Alarm Over Attack on Ward M1, Names Orelope, Ejibadero and De Royal as Alleged Masterminds

Chief Adeyinka Odukoya condemns attack on party members as ADC leadership promises investigation, support for victims and stronger security measures.

Tension has reportedly gripped the African Democratic Congress (ADC) in Alimosho Local Government Area of Lagos State following an attack on members of Ward M1 on Thursday, October 22, 2026.

The attack reportedly left several members injured, while personal belongings were allegedly stolen and chairs and other sitting materials destroyed.

In a press statement issued on Friday, October 23, the Chairman of the ADC Alimosho Local Government Management Team, Chief Adeyinka Odukoya, condemned the incident and identified Joke Orelope, Ejibadero and De Royal as alleged masterminds of the attack.

The allegations, as contained in the party chairman's statement, have not been independently verified. The statement provided to this publication did not include responses from the individuals named.

How the Incident Unfolded

According to Odukoya, he was accompanying the ADC Alimosho executives and party candidates on a tour of Ward D and Ward M2 when he received the report of the attack.

He said he immediately contacted the state chairman and relevant security agencies to ensure a prompt response and prevent further incidents.

Odukoya later led members of his entourage, alongside House of Assembly Constituency I candidate Ojogbon Gideon Adeniran and House of Representatives candidate Hon. Ola Olusola Motunrayo, to the affected ward and the police station.

They met with the Ward M1 chairman and some members, including women. Members who had sustained injuries and were still present received attention.

The party leadership said it had initiated further security measures to establish the circumstances surrounding the attack and determine those responsible.

Orelope, Ejibadero and De Royal Named in Party Chairman's Statement

A major development in the incident is the allegation contained in Odukoya's press statement naming Joke Orelope, Ejibadero and De Royal as the alleged masterminds.

The allegation raises questions about the circumstances surrounding the attack and the security of party members in Alimosho.

However, the allegation remains an allegation and should not be treated as proof of responsibility. An impartial investigation is necessary to establish what happened, identify any individuals involved and determine whether any offence was committed.

The responses of the individuals named were not included in the statement available to this publication.

ADC Plans Support for Affected Members

Beyond condemning the incident, the ADC Alimosho leadership has outlined measures intended to address the losses suffered by affected members.

Odukoya directed the Ward M1 executives to prepare a comprehensive inventory of missing personal belongings and damaged property. The report will be submitted to the state chairman to facilitate appropriate intervention and support.

An emergency meeting involving party elders, leaders, local government executives and ward chairmen was scheduled for Friday, October 23.

The meeting is expected to discuss the welfare of injured members, possible assistance for those who suffered losses, and measures to prevent a recurrence.

The party also plans to examine ways to improve security across its 11 wards and 36 LASIEC wards, including appropriate engagement with conventional and non-conventional security outfits.

Odukoya Reaffirms Commitment to Members' Safety

The ADC Alimosho chairman assured party members that their safety and welfare remained a priority.

He pledged that the leadership would take reasonable steps to protect members, cooperate with relevant security agencies and pursue appropriate action based on the findings of the investigation.

The party also called on members to remain calm, vigilant and united as efforts continue to establish the facts surrounding the incident.

The Need for a Credible Investigation

The reported attack underscores the importance of protecting political party members from violence, intimidation and the destruction of property.

Regardless of internal disagreements or political differences, party members must be able to assemble and participate in lawful political activities without fear for their safety.

The immediate priorities are to ensure that injured members receive appropriate care, document losses, investigate the attack and establish responsibility through credible evidence.

With the party chairman's statement naming three individuals as alleged masterminds, the attention now turns to the relevant security agencies and any further evidence that may clarify the allegations.

The outcome of a fair and impartial investigation will be essential to establishing the facts and ensuring that any person found responsible is held accountable in accordance with the law.

Friday, 16 October 2026

AYEGBAJU INTERNATIONAL MARKET MUST SERVE THE PEOPLE, NOT PRIVILEGED INTERESTS

The recent visit of the Osun State Commissioner for Commerce and Industry, Rev. Dr. Bunmi Jenyo, to Ayegbaju International Market raises serious concerns about the direction of market administration and the welfare of ordinary traders.

Ayegbaju Market was established to promote commerce, expand trading opportunities and improve the livelihoods of market men and women, particularly ordinary traders whose economic survival depends on affordable access to stalls and shops. It must not become an avenue for displacing the poor while politically connected individuals benefit from the conversion and reallocation of public commercial facilities.

The market was developed under the administration of former Governor Rauf Aregbesola and commissioned in July 2014 as part of a wider effort to restore Osogbo's commercial importance. Its facilities included open stalls, mini-stalls, meat and fish sections, warehouses and cold rooms. These provisions reflected the market's intended commercial purpose and the need to accommodate different categories of traders.

Against this background, the reported demolition of kiosks without transparent guarantees of alternative trading spaces is deeply troubling. Removing traders' means of livelihood while allegedly reallocating spaces and stalls to favoured individuals is not market reform; it is a potential transfer of economic opportunity from the vulnerable to the privileged. Government must publish the criteria governing allocation, reallocation and any proposed demolition.

Even more disturbing are concerns that structures originally intended for trading are being altered or converted into factories for salt production and sales, reportedly benefiting interests connected to those exercising authority over the market. These allegations require an independent investigation, full disclosure of approvals and contracts, and clarification of who owns or controls the facilities concerned. Public commercial infrastructure must not be appropriated for private advantage.

The displacement of traders in the fish and meat sections would compound the hardship already confronting small-scale traders and their families. These are livelihoods, not disposable structures. Any reorganisation must protect existing occupants, provide suitable alternative spaces before displacement, and ensure that affected traders are not priced out of the market.

The Commissioner's invocation of Governor Ademola Adeleke's name and the traders' electoral support for his administration cannot substitute for accountability. Government exists to protect citizens' interests, not to use political loyalty as justification for policies that may undermine their economic survival.

We therefore call on Governor Ademola Adeleke to urgently:

1.  Suspend further demolitions and structural conversions pending an independent review.

2.  Publish the records of stall allocations and reassignments.

3.  Investigate allegations of preferential treatment and private appropriation of public assets.

4.  Ensure that displaced traders receive suitable alternative spaces before any further action.

Ayegbaju International Market is a public economic asset whose administration must be guided by transparency, fairness and social justice. The promise of government must be measured not by official visits or assurances, but by whether ordinary people can earn a living with dignity.

Governor Adeleke must ensure that Ayegbaju remains a market for the people, not a preserve for privileged interests.

Signed:

Comrade Wale Balogun

Convener, Mẹkunnu Kọya

16/10/2026

Wednesday, 14 October 2026

Fuel Relief Is Not Living Dignity: GAFAMORG Calls for Living Wage and Stronger Social Protection

The Gani Fawehinmi Memorial Organization (GAFAMORG) has called on the Federal Government to move beyond temporary fuel-related relief measures and adopt a sustainable economic framework built around a Living Wage, accessible public services and comprehensive social protection.

In a statement addressing Nigeria’s escalating cost-of-living crisis, the organisation expressed support for the legitimate demands of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), urging the government to take urgent, concrete and transparent measures to protect workers, pensioners, informal-sector workers and struggling households.

GAFAMORG noted that rising fuel prices have consequences far beyond the cost of transportation, contributing to higher food prices and increasing the cost of housing, healthcare, education and other essential services.

According to the organisation, temporary palliatives may provide short-term relief but cannot resolve the structural problems undermining household incomes and living standards.

Minimum Wage Must Reflect the Cost of Living

GAFAMORG stressed the distinction between a National Minimum Wage, which establishes a legal wage floor, and a Living Wage, which should enable workers to afford decent food, secure housing, transportation, healthcare, education and other essential needs for themselves and their families.

The organisation maintained that wage negotiations should be informed by verified living costs and assessed according to the purchasing power of workers, rather than the nominal amount announced.

It called for evidence-based minimum-wage negotiations, regular and predictable wage reviews, stronger enforcement of wage laws and collective agreements, and a clear, time-bound pathway towards a Living Wage.

Six-Point Agenda for Economic Dignity

The organisation outlined six priority demands:

  1. Immediate and transparent relief: Effective measures to cushion the impact of rising fuel and living costs.

  2. Evidence-based wage negotiations: Wage reviews grounded in current and verifiable household expenditure.

  3. A pathway to a Living Wage: Time-bound measures supported by collective bargaining and regular wage reviews.

  4. Enforcement of labour rights: Stronger implementation of minimum-wage laws and collective agreements across public and private sectors.

  5. A comprehensive Social Wage: Improved access to affordable healthcare, quality public education, transportation, housing support, adequate pensions and protection against unemployment, disability and workplace injuries.

  6. Inclusive protection: Policies that recognise the needs of formal-sector workers, informal workers, self-employed Nigerians and pensioners.

GAFAMORG emphasised that a Living Wage and a Social Wage must advance together. While the former concerns the income workers earn, the latter encompasses essential public services and social protections that reduce the financial burden on households.

The organisation argued that the effectiveness of economic policy should ultimately be measured by whether ordinary Nigerians can afford basic necessities without being trapped in persistent anxiety and financial insecurity.

GAFAMORG Launches People's Living Dignity Test 2026

As part of its public advocacy, GAFAMORG announced the People's Living Dignity Test 2026, a voluntary questionnaire designed to gather citizens' experiences of wages, living costs, access to public services and social protection.

The organisation explained that the initiative is intended to amplify the voices of ordinary Nigerians and encourage wider public participation in discussions about workers' welfare and economic policy. It clarified that the questionnaire is not a substitute for official statistics or academic research.

GAFAMORG called on the NLC, the Trade Union Congress (TUC), other labour organisations, employers, professional associations, informal workers, pensioners, civil society organisations, community leaders, academics, journalists and members of the public to support and circulate the questionnaire.

Members of the public can participate through the official People's Living Dignity Test 2026 questionnaire: [Insert verified questionnaire link here].

The organisation encouraged Nigerians to complete the questionnaire, share it within their communities and workplaces, and mobilise their unions and associations to participate.

Beyond Temporary Concessions

GAFAMORG concluded that Nigeria needs a long-term economic framework that protects purchasing power, improves access to essential services and guarantees greater economic security for workers and their families.

It reiterated that lasting economic dignity requires more than temporary concessions, calling for coordinated action on wages, pensions, public services and social protection.

The statement ended with the organisation's commitment to its founding ideals:

“GAFAMORG — For the Voiceless and Defenceless! Remembering Gani by Continuing His Struggle.”

Monday, 12 October 2026

Groups Accuse INEC, APC of Undermining Electoral Credibility Ahead of 2027 Polls

CACOBAG, CDJ demand restoration of omitted candidates, review of electoral provisions

The Coalition Against Corruption and Bad Governance (CACOBAG) and the Centre for Democracy and Justice (CDJ) have called on the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), the National Assembly and the judiciary to address controversies surrounding the final list of candidates for the 2027 general elections.

In a joint statement issued on Monday, October 12, 2026, the organisations alleged that the omission of candidates, disputed party-primary outcomes and restrictive membership registration requirements could undermine political participation and public confidence in the elections.

They accused the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), President Bola Tinubu’s administration and INEC of actions they said could disadvantage opposition parties. The allegations represent the groups’ position and were not independently established by the statement.

The concerns come amid reported disputes over candidates omitted from INEC’s published lists. The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), for instance, has confirmed that it is engaging the commission over the exclusion of some of its candidates, including Ladi Adebutu in Ogun State and Isa Pantami in Gombe State. <Cite refs={["turn525173search1","turn525173search2"]}/>

Disputed nominations and candidate omissions

The groups cited cases involving candidates from several political parties, including the PDP, NDC, ADC, NNPP, Labour Party, APM and ADP, arguing that the controversy extends beyond a single party.

They also alleged irregularities in the APC’s handling of its primaries in Lagos State, specifically citing Hon. Ganiyu Kola Egunjobi, whom they said won the party’s primary for Agege Constituency I with 9,132 votes but was subsequently replaced. They further alleged similar impositions in Alimosho and Ikeja.

CACOBAG and CDJ called for the publication of primary-election results and video recordings held by INEC, arguing that these records would help establish whether the nominations and subsequent substitutions complied with the law.

However, the reasons for individual omissions and the circumstances surrounding the disputed nominations must be assessed against INEC’s records, relevant court decisions and responses from the political parties concerned.

Electoral law and membership registration

The organisations also challenged provisions of the Electoral Act 2026 governing party membership registers and participation in primaries.

Section 77(5) of the Act provides that only party members whose names appear on a membership register submitted to INEC at least 21 days before a primary, congress or convention may participate in the exercise. Related provisions restrict the use of alternative registers and prescribe consequences for failure to submit the required register. <Cite refs={["turn525173search2","turn525173search4"]}/>

The groups argued that these requirements could exclude prospective party members, particularly those facing barriers to digital access, registration costs and verification procedures. They also criticised INEC’s reported online registration policy, saying it could disproportionately affect low-income citizens.

Their objections come despite a September 2026 Supreme Court decision upholding the challenged statutory membership-register provisions. The organisations maintained that the provisions should nevertheless be reviewed, arguing that they could restrict internal party democracy and political participation. <Cite refs={["turn525173search2","turn525173search3"]}/>

Calls for transparency and accountability

The groups accused INEC of inconsistency in its handling of candidate nominations and qualification-related complaints. They urged the commission to explain the basis for disputed omissions and substitutions and to apply electoral rules transparently across all political parties.

They also criticised provisions they said could restrict post-election challenges involving alleged certificate forgery, falsification, impersonation and perjury, arguing that electoral timelines should not shield criminal conduct from lawful investigation.

The statement urged the National Assembly to reconsider provisions the organisations consider restrictive and called on the judiciary to ensure that electoral disputes are resolved in accordance with the Constitution and applicable laws.

CACOBAG and CDJ appealed to pro-democracy and civil society organisations, including the United Action for Democracy, Committee for the Defence of Human Rights, SERAP, CISLAC and Transition Monitoring Group, to engage the issues. They also called on the Nigerian Bar Association, Nigeria Labour Congress and Trade Union Congress to defend democratic participation.

Four demands

The organisations presented four principal demands:

  1. Restoration of candidates: INEC should restore candidates whom the groups believe were validly nominated but unlawfully excluded.
  2. Publication of records: The commission should release results and video recordings of monitored party primaries, particularly the Labour Party primaries in Lagos State.
  3. Review of electoral provisions: The National Assembly should repeal or amend provisions the groups consider restrictive of party membership and judicial scrutiny of alleged certificate forgery.
  4. Judicial protection: Courts should scrutinise disputed candidate substitutions and ensure compliance with applicable legal requirements.

The statement was signed by CACOBAG Chairman, Prince Toyin Raheem; the organisation’s Publicity Secretary, Pastor Olutola Folorunsho; and CDJ Acting Secretary, Comrade Bello Bello.

The groups said their intervention was not intended to endorse any political party or candidate but to protect the right of Nigerians to make their electoral choices freely.

They warned that unresolved disputes over nominations, membership registration and the application of electoral laws could weaken confidence in the 2027 elections, urging electoral authorities and political parties to address the controversies through transparent and lawful procedures.

Saturday, 10 October 2026

Tinubu’s Fuel Price Contradiction: Economic Injustice Must End, Nigerians Must Defend Their 2027 Votes

President Bola Tinubu’s 30-day petrol price intervention has reopened a fundamental debate about economic consistency, the burden of fuel pricing on ordinary Nigerians and the government’s responsibility to protect citizens from worsening hardship.

The Federal Government’s decision to have NNPC Retail forgo its retail profit margin and sell petrol at cost raises questions about the relationship between the administration’s commitment to deregulation and its willingness to intervene when prices become politically and economically difficult to sustain.

During a televised interview, Tinubu responded to a question from Babajide Kolade Otitoju about controlling petrol prices by declaring that he did not believe in price control. The publicly available interview provides a basis for examining the consistency of the administration’s current approach.

Although the Presidency has clarified that the 30-day measure is not a restoration of blanket fuel subsidy, Nigerians deserve a clear explanation of its scope, implementation and likely consequences when it expires.

The central question is straightforward: why should citizens bear the full weight of harsh economic adjustments only to receive temporary relief when the consequences become increasingly difficult to ignore?Economic policies must serve the people

The removal of longstanding petroleum price support and the adoption of market oriented policies have significantly altered the economic conditions confronting Nigerian households. Rising transport expenses affect food prices, workers’ disposable incomes, small businesses and the cost of accessing essential services.

For millions of Nigerians, the debate is not simply about whether petrol prices are determined by market forces. It is about whether wages, public services and social protection can sustain a decent standard of living under prevailing economic conditions.

Government must therefore be judged by the practical consequences of its policies. Economic reform cannot be considered successful merely because it changes pricing arrangements or satisfies a particular economic doctrine. It must also demonstrate measurable improvements in livelihoods, productivity, employment and public welfare.

Nigerians must not be impoverished by government policies only to be offered short-term relief as an instrument of electoral persuasion. Poverty must never become a weapon for trading away the people's economic dignity or democratic choices.

Nigeria’s foreign economic agreements require transparency

The Nigeria–France tax cooperation memorandum and the September 2026 Nigeria–United States mineral investment pact also deserve public scrutiny.

The tax cooperation arrangement involves collaboration between Nigeria’s Federal Inland Revenue Service and France’s tax authority. The mineral investment pact establishes a framework for American investment in Nigeria’s mineral sector, whose resources the Federal Government values at $700 billion.

International cooperation and foreign investment can offer opportunities for economic development. However, the public has a legitimate interest in understanding the terms of agreements that may affect national revenue, mineral wealth, regulatory authority and the distribution of economic benefits.

The government should explain how these arrangements protect Nigeria’s interests, strengthen domestic capacity, improve revenue generation and create tangible benefits for citizens and host communities.

Economic sovereignty is not necessarily incompatible with international partnerships. Rather, it requires that such partnerships be negotiated transparently, administered responsibly and structured to advance national development.

The temporary petrol price intervention raises another pressing question: what happens when the 30 days end?

The possibility of petrol prices reaching ₦2,200–₦2,500 per litre by December has been raised as a concern. Such figures should not be treated as confirmed future prices without reliable supporting evidence. Nevertheless, Nigerians deserve transparent information about the factors driving petroleum prices and the government’s plans for preventing further deterioration in living standards.

Comparisons with petrol prices in other countries are also insufficient when they ignore differences in wages, purchasing power, taxation, public transport, social protection and living standards.

The real measure of affordability is not the price displayed at a filling station alone. It is the proportion of a worker’s income required to purchase fuel and meet other essential needs.

A responsible economic policy must account for food, transportation, housing, healthcare, education and employment. The market cannot be treated as an abstract mechanism detached from the people whose daily lives depend on it.

2027: NIGERIANS MUST DEFEND THEIR DEMOCRATIC CHOICES 

Economic hardship and democratic accountability are closely connected. Citizens must be able to evaluate the performance of those in power and determine, through credible elections, whether they deserve another mandate.

As Nigeria approaches the 2027 general elections, voters must organise to protect the integrity of the electoral process. Political parties, civil society organisations, election observers and citizens should monitor polling activities, document irregularities, report violations and pursue lawful remedies.

The responsibility to protect the ballot extends beyond election day. It includes defending the transparency of the entire process, demanding accountability from electoral institutions and insisting that every legitimate vote counts.

Governor Babagana Zulum and other political figures whose public statements have raised concerns about electoral manipulation must understand that Nigerians will not accept the subversion of their democratic rights.

No politician owns Nigeria’s democracy. No political party has the right to impose an electoral outcome contrary to the lawful choices of voters.

Our response to electoral fraud, intimidation and the denial of legitimate mandates must be organised, peaceful, lawful and resolute.

Our call to action

Mẹkunnu Kọya calls on Nigerians to demand:

* Transparent petrol pricing: Clear information about the 30-day intervention, its implementation and the arrangements that will follow its expiration.

* Economic accountability: Public explanations of policies and agreements affecting national revenue, mineral resources and citizens’ welfare.

* People centred economic reforms: Policies that address purchasing power, employment, the cost of living and the protection of vulnerable households.

* Credible elections: Effective monitoring, transparent procedures and lawful action against electoral fraud and intimidation.

- Protection of the people’s mandate: A collective commitment to ensuring that every legitimate vote is counted and respected.

Nigeria cannot build a just society by asking its citizens to endure indefinite hardship while denying them meaningful accountability. Nor can democracy flourish when voters fear that their choices may be manipulated.

The struggle for economic dignity and the defence of the ballot are inseparable. Nigerians must neither surrender their economic future to policies that impoverish them nor surrender their democratic mandates to those who seek to subvert them.

Our message is clear:

ONE PERSON, ONE VOTE!

NO RIGGING, NO STOLEN MANDATE!

PROTECT THE VOTE, DEFEND THE PEOPLE’S WILL!

Comrade Wale Balogun is the Convener of Mẹkunnu Kọya. He writes from Lagos.

9 October 2026.

Monday, 5 October 2026

Rhodes-Vivour to APC: Stop Majoring on My Yoruba, Face Lagos’ Problems

 ADC candidate accuses ruling party of using Yoruba controversy to divert attention from roads, flooding, housing, traffic and waste crisis

By Our Correspondent

African Democratic Congress (ADC) governorship candidate in Lagos State, Gbadebo Rhodes-Vivour, has accused the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) of deliberately turning the controversy over his Yoruba proficiency into a political distraction from the worsening challenges confronting Lagos residents.

Rhodes-Vivour, reacting to the mockery directed at his Yoruba language ability, said those attacking him should instead explain how more than two decades of APC administration had improved the lives of ordinary Lagosians.

He said the APC's focus on his Yoruba was an attempt to make Lagosians “major on the minor” rather than confront the realities of life in the state.

“As usual, the APC has resorted to its familiar strategy of distraction. Its loudest voices are not talking about the impact of their government on the people of Lagos.”

According to him, the issues demanding urgent attention include deteriorating roads, worsening flooding, a housing crisis, unreliable public water supply, crippling traffic and growing environmental degradation.

“They are not telling Lagosians how they have made their lives better. They are not talking about the state of our roads, the worsening flooding, the housing crisis, the lack of reliable public water, the traffic crisis or the growing filth across our city.”

Rhodes-Vivour said the same pattern of distraction was deployed during the 2023 election, when, according to him, political thuggery, intimidation and violence were used to force the APC's way into office.

He accused the ruling party of maintaining a political culture in which violence and intimidation are used to compensate for the inability to win public confidence through governance and performance.

“Why won’t the APC confront this problem? Because they depend on the same thugs and the same culture of political violence to force their way into power.”

He argued that a government confident in its record should be willing to defend that record before the people rather than shift public attention to peripheral controversies.

‘Lagos Traffic Is Not a Lifestyle’

Rhodes-Vivour also criticised the government's handling of transportation, housing, infrastructure and water supply.

He said roads have deteriorated, flooding has become more widespread, rents have continued to rise and affordable housing remains grossly inadequate.

On traffic, he accused the government of abandoning the search for lasting solutions and attempting instead to normalise congestion as an inevitable feature of Lagos.

“They have effectively given up on solving the traffic crisis. Now, instead of admitting failure and fixing the problem, they tell us that traffic is a ‘lifestyle.’”

He also questioned the state of public water supply, saying many Lagos communities continue to live without dependable access to government-provided water.

‘That Is Why Lagos Stinks’

The ADC candidate reserved some of his strongest criticism for waste management.

Rhodes-Vivour said Lagos operated more than 1,000 Private Sector Participation (PSP) waste trucks under former Governor Babatunde Fashola, but that the number has fallen to roughly 200 despite more than 12 years of APC administration.

He questioned how a rapidly expanding megacity could experience such a drastic reduction in waste collection capacity.

According to him, the problem is not simply the number of trucks but a waste management system undermined by corruption, poor management and what he described as racketeering around diesel, truck leasing and waste collection.

“The problem is not simply a lack of trucks. It is a system that has been weakened by corruption, poor management and alleged racketeering around diesel, truck leasing and waste collection.”

Rhodes-Vivour said the consequence is increasingly visible in communities across Lagos.

“That is why Lagos stinks.”

For him, the waste crisis is a governance failure, not merely a question of residents keeping their immediate surroundings clean.

‘We Must Stop Allowing Them to Change the Subject’

Rhodes-Vivour said his criticism of the APC does not diminish the importance he attaches to Yoruba language, culture and heritage.

Rather, he argued that cultural identity should not be weaponised to distract Lagosians from demanding accountability on governance.

He challenged the APC to stop changing the subject and answer the fundamental question confronting the state after years in power.

“The question is not who can shout the loudest. The question is, after all these years in power, have they made Lagos better for the ordinary Lagosian?”

He urged Lagosians to keep their attention on the issues that directly affect their lives.

“That is the conversation we should be having. That is the conversation they want us to avoid. And that is exactly the conversation we must continue to have.”

For Rhodes-Vivour, the central issue is therefore not whether he can satisfy his political opponents in a Yoruba language exchange, but whether those who have governed Lagos for years can demonstrate that their policies have delivered a better, cleaner, safer and more affordable city for ordinary Lagosians.

The message from the ADC candidate is unmistakable: Lagosians should not allow a debate over language to displace the bigger debate over governance, accountability and the quality of life in Lagos.

Sunday, 4 October 2026

CULTURE, LANGUAGE AND THE HYPOCRISY OF ETHNIC POLITICS IN LAGOS

 

Culture is the total way of life of a people. It encompasses our folklore, songs, dances, dressing, food, religion, traditions and, most importantly, our language. Through language, a people communicate, preserve their history, transmit knowledge and values, and pass their collective worldview from one generation to another.

Language is therefore not merely a means of communication; it is a repository of identity and collective memory. A people who lose their language risk losing an important part of their cultural consciousness. This is why the countries generally regarded as developed have preserved and promoted their indigenous languages in governance, education, social interaction and knowledge production, despite the historical exploitation of Africa's human and material resources by many of those same powers.

Colonialism deliberately disrupted this cultural continuity in Africa. Colonial languages were imposed on African societies and became official or dominant languages, while indigenous religions, traditions and systems of knowledge were systematically undermined. Christianity and Islam subsequently became dominant religious traditions across much of Africa.

The consequences of this cultural dislocation remain evident today. Yet cultural identity cannot be reduced to the ability to speak a particular language. Speaking Yoruba fluently does not automatically make someone a better Yoruba person, just as not speaking Yoruba fluently does not make someone less Yoruba. Commitment to a people's history, culture, traditions, values and collective advancement must also be taken into consideration.

It is against this background that I find the current campaign of blackmail and propaganda against the African Democratic Congress (ADC) governorship candidate, Gbadebo Rhodes-Vivour, simply because he does not speak Yoruba fluently, both appalling and intellectually dishonest.

The APC propaganda machinery and its political data boys are making a spectacle of Gbadebo's language proficiency, as though fluency in Yoruba were the ultimate measure of Yoruba identity, political legitimacy or commitment to Lagos.

It is not.

On several fronts, Gbadebo has demonstrated a strong commitment to Yoruba culture and tradition. From close observation, his cultural identification is more visible than that of many of those now attacking him.

Gbadebo hardly wears English or other foreign modes of dressing and attire. He is frequently seen in Yoruba traditional clothing, including fitting caps, as part of his normal public appearance. This is significant because cultural identity should not be something politicians remember only when elections are approaching.

His public identification with Ìṣẹ̀ṣe, the indigenous Yoruba religious and cultural system, is another important dimension of his cultural outlook.

The argument about Gbadebo's Yoruba identity is further strengthened by the fact that Yoruba traditionalists have publicly defended his Yoruba lineage and explained the basis for his Obalefun title.

At the same time, some of those presenting themselves as the ultimate defenders of Yoruba identity have historically shown little interest in preserving indigenous African spirituality and traditional institutions, even while promoting Christianity and Islam.

Again, there is nothing wrong with Nigerians practising Christianity or Islam. Freedom of religion is fundamental.

The issue is consistency. It is difficult to accept the argument that a person's Yoruba identity should be questioned because he cannot speak Yoruba fluently while the same political environment routinely celebrates foreign religious and cultural influences and, in some instances, commits public resources to religious pilgrimages.

Culture should not become an electoral costume, and language should not become a weapon of ethnic exclusion.

THE SAME OLD "ỌMỌ ÌGBÒ" PROPAGANDA

We saw this same politics during the 2023 governorship election, when the campaign of calumny portrayed Gbadebo as Ọmọ Ìgbò, suggesting that his allegiance would be to the Igbo people simply because his mother is Igbo.

This was primitive ethnic politics.

The hypocrisy becomes even clearer when we consider the extensive inter-ethnic relationships within Nigeria's political class itself.

The late Rotimi Akeredolu, a prominent Yoruba politician and APC governor of Ondo State, was married to Betty Anyanwu-Akeredolu, an Igbo woman from Imo State. Their marriage was publicly known, and Betty herself spoke about the ethnic prejudices surrounding their relationship.

So why should Gbadebo's Igbo maternal heritage suddenly become evidence that he cannot be trusted with the affairs of Lagos?

Why should marriage or maternal ancestry determine political loyalty?

Lagos itself is a product of centuries of interaction among different peoples. It is a cosmopolitan city with a deep Yoruba historical and cultural foundation. Being Yoruba does not require Lagos to become an ethnic prison.

The renewed campaign against Gbadebo is therefore empty. Lagosians are wiser.

And I ask a simple question: how many times did Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu and his predecessors, including President Bola Ahmed Tinubu when he was governor of Lagos, address Lagosians in Yoruba during major public engagements?

If language proficiency is to become the ultimate test of Yoruba identity and political legitimacy, the APC should apply its own standard consistently.

Let us stop pretending.

The real question before Lagos voters is not whether Gbadebo Rhodes-Vivour speaks Yoruba with the fluency of someone born and raised in a Yoruba-speaking household.

The real questions are:

What does he have to offer Lagos?

Can he provide better governance?

Can he tackle flooding?

Can he address the housing crisis?

Can he improve transportation?

Can he create opportunities for young Lagosians?

Can he protect public resources?

Can he promote accountability and transparency?

Can he preserve Lagos's history, culture and heritage?

Can he offer Lagosians a credible alternative to the political dynasty that has dominated the state for the last 27 years?

These are the questions that should determine the future of Lagos—not whether a candidate's mother is Igbo or whether he previously struggled to speak Yoruba fluently.

Gbadebo has also taken steps to improve his Yoruba and has said publicly that he engaged a Yoruba teacher and intends to campaign in the language. That effort should be encouraged, not ridiculed. A person who recognises a weakness and takes deliberate steps to correct it should be commended.

The Yoruba electorate should therefore see beyond the shenanigans, ethnic rhetoric and propaganda surrounding Gbadebo Rhodes-Vivour.

We should judge political candidates by their competence, integrity, commitment, vision and what they intend to do for the people.

The politics of saying "Gbadebo is Ọmọ Ìgbò" because his mother is Igbo is as mischievous as saying that somebody is automatically a better Yoruba because he can speak Yoruba fluently.

Yoruba identity is bigger than language alone. Yoruba civilisation is bigger than political propaganda. And the Yoruba people are bigger than politicians who exploit their identity for electoral advantage.

Our strong appeal to the Lagos electorate is therefore to vote for a credible alternative to the mischievous propaganda of the ruling party in Lagos.

Let Lagosians reject ethnic blackmail.

Let Lagosians reject political manipulation.

Let Lagosians demand competence, accountability and development.

Let Lagosians choose a government that belongs to the people rather than a political dynasty.

And let the Akotileta government understand one thing:

Yorùbá ò pọnú — Yoruba people are not stupid.

Comrade Wale Balogun
National Coordinator, Yoruba Revolutionary Movement (YOREM)
Convener, Mẹkunnu Kọya
Writes from Lagos
4 October 2026

Saturday, 3 October 2026

Osun Floods: A Peer Review of Four Administrations and the Aregbesola Environmental Legacy

 


From Oyinlola to Aregbesola, Oyetola and Adeleke; what happened to Osun's drains, canals, waterways and waste management?

By Comrade Wale Balogun, Convener, Mẹkunnu Kọya

The serious flooding now affecting parts of Osun State is more than a seasonal inconvenience. Homes, shops, businesses and personal belongings are being destroyed, while families are again being exposed to hardship and uncertainty.

For many residents, the situation inevitably brings back memories of an earlier period when the state government embarked on a deliberate programme of dredging rivers, opening waterways, expanding drainage channels, removing obstructions and deploying O'YES cadets to keep public spaces and drainage corridors clean.

A peer review of the four administrations of Olagunsoye Oyinlola, Rauf Aregbesola, Gboyega Oyetola and Ademola Adeleke therefore provides useful lessons.

Oyinlola: when flooding became a recurring crisis

The later Oyinlola years were marked by serious flooding, culminating in the devastating 2010 experience that preceded the change of government. Gbonmi became one of the symbolic examples.

The name itself became part of the political folklore of Osogbo because of the area's repeated flooding. In a 2016 report, Punch recalled that a former governor had jokingly told residents during a television programme that they should either be prepared to continue bailing water from their houses or relocate because, having chosen to live there, they had “met the water.” The former governor referred to was Olagunsoye Oyinlola.

Whatever the humour intended, the statement is revealing of an older philosophy of governance: treating a flood prone community as though its residents, rather than government, bore the primary responsibility for the environmental danger.

Good governance should take the opposite approach, identify the danger, intervene before disaster and protect citizens and their property.

Aregbesola: from reaction to prevention

Aregbesola fundamentally changed the approach. His administration introduced O'Clean, expanded waste management, deployed O'YES cadets for sanitation and environmental work, cleared vegetation, desilted waterways and embarked on major channelisation projects.

The important distinction was that the government did not wait for flood victims to start bailing water before acting. It attempted to remove the conditions that produced the flooding.

The scale was considerable. Contemporary reporting recorded extensive desilting of rivers, streams and canals across Osun, including major interventions in Osogbo. By 2018, The Guardian reported that approximately 861 kilometres of waterways, canals and streams had been desilted over seven years.

Gbonmi: the clearest test case

The most compelling evidence is Gbonmi itself. The administration implemented the Gbonmi–Obaate, Okooko River channelisation project. The Guardian reported that Gbonmi, previously known for frequent flooding, had remained flood free for seven years following the intervention. Similar channelisation works were undertaken around Rasco, Alekunwodo and Old Nitel, Alekunwodo.

A 2016 letter published by The Nation provides an even more personal account. A resident described how his parents' home in Gbonmi had flooded every year before 2011, forcing the family to consider relocating. After Aregbesola's desilting and waterway clearing programme, the family reported that they no longer had to abandon the house during the rains.

This is the practical meaning of preventive governance. The government did not tell Gbonmi residents to learn how to bail water. It attacked the cause of the problem.

Oyetola: some continuity, but not the same momentum

Oyetola inherited both the environmental infrastructure and the institutional machinery established under Aregbesola, under whom he had served as Chief of Staff.

To his credit, he did not completely abandon the environmental programme.

His administration continued dredging. In 2019 and 2020, it cleared and dredged several rivers and waterways, including the Osun River, Opopo River, Rasco Stream and other channels. It also strengthened enforcement against indiscriminate refuse disposal.

Oyetola also retained and later expanded O'YES. His administration increased cadet allowances and described the scheme as a legacy programme that should be sustained.

But the critical question is continuity of intensity and strategic purpose.

Aregbesola's environmental programme had been conceived as a broad, visible and continuous intervention involving sanitation, waste collection, drainage, canalisation, river dredging, vegetation control and youth mobilisation.

Under Oyetola, some of these components continued, but the momentum and comprehensive character of the earlier intervention were less evident. The result was that recurring flooding remained a problem in places such as Gbonmi, Gbodofon, Rasco, Alekunwodo and other Osogbo communities.

The 2019 flooding itself demonstrated that the earlier gains required much more systematic maintenance and expansion. More than 100 houses were reported submerged in Osogbo, with Gbonmi, Gbodofon, Awosuru and other areas affected.

Thus, the fairest criticism of Oyetola is not that he did nothing, but that he did not build sufficiently on the scale and integrated preventive approach of the administration he had served.

Adeleke: renewed intervention, but the problem remains

The Adeleke administration inherited the same environmental challenge. It has undertaken renewed dredging and drainage clearance, including work on the Osun River in Osogbo, and has warned residents against dumping refuse into waterways.

The administration has also responded to recent flooding by ordering emergency clearance of waterways and proposing a more comprehensive flood management framework.

These are necessary interventions. But the recurrence of serious flooding demonstrates that emergency response cannot substitute for permanent environmental management.

The state needs a system in which rivers and canals are routinely inspected and desilted before the rainy season, drainage channels are kept open throughout the year, illegal structures on waterways are removed and waste disposal is effectively regulated.

The O'YES lesson

The environmental dimension of O'YES deserves special attention. The cadets were not merely unemployed young people receiving stipends. Through cadres such as the Green Gang, Public Sanitation and Public Works Brigade, they provided visible manpower for keeping communities clean, cutting weeds and assisting with environmental maintenance.

Oyetola continued the scheme and, by 2022, announced another recruitment exercise after a period of reduced activity.

Adeleke subsequently replaced O'YES with the Imole Youth Corps. Whatever the political arguments surrounding the different schemes, the environmental lesson is straightforward: Osun needs a permanent community based environmental workforce.

Young people can be trained and deployed to clear vegetation, maintain drainage corridors, monitor blocked waterways, support waste collection and report emerging flood risks.

This should not be treated as a temporary political programme. It should be part of the state's environmental infrastructure.

The verdict

The peer review produces a reasonably clear picture.

Oyinlola: inherited and presided over a period in which recurrent flooding exposed the weakness of the state's preventive drainage system. The insensitive joke attributed to him about Gbonmi residents “meeting the water” became an unfortunate symbol of that era.

Aregbesola: introduced the most comprehensive and visibly preventive environmental intervention of the four administrations — O'Clean, O'YES environmental manpower, waste management, drainage expansion, river dredging and major channelisation. The transformation reported in Gbonmi is the strongest practical evidence of its effectiveness.

Oyetola: continued some of the inherited programmes, including dredging, waste enforcement and O'YES, but failed to sustain the environmental intervention with the same breadth and momentum required to consolidate Aregbesola's gains. The recurring floods showed the cost of insufficient continuity.

Adeleke: has renewed dredging, drainage clearance and environmental enforcement, but the recurrence of serious flooding demonstrates that the state still needs a permanent, integrated flood prevention system rather than periodic emergency interventions.

What Osun should do now

The immediate priority should be prevention. Government should urgently deploy the appropriate heavy equipment, including swamp bulldozers, excavators and dredging equipment where technically necessary, to clear blocked rivers, canals and drainage channels throughout Osun and adjoining affected communities.

But equipment alone is not enough.

Osun needs:

  • routine pre rainy season dredging and desilting;
  • continuous clearing of drainage channels;
  • strict enforcement against dumping refuse into waterways;
  • removal of structures obstructing natural waterways;
  • restoration and protection of flood plains;
  • properly funded waste collection;
  • a permanent community environmental workforce;
  • flood risk mapping and early warning systems; and
  • transparent annual environmental performance reports.

The Gbonmi experience has already demonstrated what preventive investment can accomplish. The lesson should not be forgotten.

When government clears the waterways before the rain comes, people do not have to spend the rainy season bailing water out of their homes.

Good governance is not simply arriving after disaster with relief materials. It is anticipating danger, preventing avoidable damage, protecting lives and safeguarding the homes, businesses and livelihoods of citizens.

Osun deserves nothing less.

GAFAMORG Backs Labour Strike, Demands Living Wage, Purchasing Power Protection

The Gani Fawehinmi Memorial Organization has thrown its weight behind the three day warning strike embarked upon by organised labour, saying the current economic crisis requires Nigerians to move beyond the traditional struggle for wage increases to a broader campaign for living dignity and national prosperity.

GAFAMORG, in a statement issued on Friday, said the strike reflected genuine concerns over declining purchasing power, soaring food and transport costs, unpaid wage related obligations and the need for a new minimum wage that would reflect the realities of Nigerian households.

The organisation, however, warned that simply increasing salaries without addressing inflation and the rising cost of essential goods and services could leave workers no better off.

“The question is no longer how much more should workers be paid, but what Nigerians must earn, and what government must provide, for people to live with dignity and build prosperity,” GAFAMORG stated.

The organisation said the current wage debate should therefore be reframed around purchasing power, arguing that the real value of a salary should be measured by what it can buy rather than by the nominal amount paid to workers.

It said, “A wage increase alone is not enough. A nominal increase can be wiped out by inflation tomorrow. What matters is not merely what a worker earns, but what that income can actually buy.”

Seven point agenda

GAFAMORG proposed a seven point framework which includes an emergency relief package for workers and pensioners, a new national living wage process, wage and pension indexation, a sustainable petrol price and transport solution, a social wage framework, inclusion of informal workers in wage institutions and the establishment of a National Living Wage and Purchasing-Power Council.

The organisation called on the Federal and state governments, in collaboration with organised labour, to negotiate and publish an emergency relief package within 14 days.

The proposed package would include wage awards, transport support and payment of arrears, with clear eligibility criteria, funding sources, payment schedules and periodic reviews based on changes in food, transport and energy prices.

It also proposed the adoption, by January 2027, of a national cost of living basket covering food, housing, transportation, energy, healthcare, education, water and communications.

According to the organisation, the methodology and data used in determining the basket must be publicly available and reflect regional differences in the cost of living.

GAFAMORG further called for legally enforceable quarterly reviews of wages and pensions, with adjustments triggered when the cost of essential goods or inflation rises by five per cent from the previous adjustment.

Fuel price not enough

On petrol pricing, GAFAMORG said the reduction of the pump price of Premium Motor Spirit alone should not be presented as evidence that Nigerians have achieved economic relief.

It called for a 90 day energy and transport stabilisation plan focused on domestic refining, reliable supply, transparent petrol pricing and affordable mass transportation.

The group also demanded regular publication of refining, importation and price components, alongside targeted and audited support for vulnerable households and public transport users.

Informal sector

GAFAMORG said millions of Nigerians working outside the formal economy must not be excluded from the national conversation on wages and economic wellbeing.

It called for a national informal work forum within 60 days, with consultations across the 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory.

Farmers, traders, artisans, transport workers, market women, pensioners, women, youths, self employed persons and civil society organisations, it said, should have a permanent voice in institutions responsible for determining national living standards.

“Informal workers cannot be invisible. They also pay rent, transport fares, fuel costs, school fees and medical bills,” the organisation said.

Proposed council

GAFAMORG also proposed the establishment of an independent National Living Wage and Purchasing Power Council within 90 days.

The council, according to the organisation, should comprise representatives of government, labour, employers, informal workers, farmers, pensioners, women, youths, civil society and experts.

It would publish monthly cost-of-living data and quarterly purchasing-power reports, recommend wage adjustments, monitor wage erosion and assess the delivery of social services.

The council would also be empowered to trigger a policy response when purchasing power falls below an agreed national threshold.

GAFAMORG said the proposed framework should introduce a new relationship between living wage, social wage and purchasing-power protection.

It said economic reforms should ultimately be judged by their impact on ordinary households.

“There should be no economic reform without purchasing power protection, no wage negotiation without a living-wage test, no pension policy without inflation protection and no prosperity agenda that excludes informal workers,” the organisation said.

GAFAMORG urged organised labour, civil society, farmers, traders, artisans, pensioners, professionals, women, youths and communities to participate in its People's Living Dignity Test 2026, saying household experiences should form part of the evidence used to assess the country's economic condition.

The organisation said the central question Nigerians should ask in the current wage debate is simple: “What will the wage actually buy?”

It added that the answer to that question should form the basis of any credible national prosperity programme.

Friday, 2 October 2026

FROM RESISTANCE TO EXILE: My 17 Months Underground

*A Cadre's Historical Account of the Struggle Against Military Tyranny*

*By Comrade Taiwo Omoniyi OTITOLAYE*

*I. June 12: The Mandate and The Betrayal*

History has moments when a people discover themselves. June 12, 1993 was such a moment.

It was not an election. It was a plebiscite against hunger and against military messianism. The Nigerian masses - from all regions, from all walks of life, including Army Barracks formation across the country- voted as a conscious class for democracy. 

Nigeria is a multiethnic, multilingual and multi-religious Nation-state. That day, Nigerians transcended region and every primordial division to speak with one voice.

The mandate of Chief M.K.O. Abiola was therefore a pan-Nigerian mandate.

That mandate was betrayed.

General Ibrahim Babangida, the self-styled evil genius, annulled the freest and fairest election in our history. He annulled hope. In its place, he installed an illegal contraption called the Interim National Government. It was a stillbirth.

From that betrayal, tyranny did not just emerge; it erupted. On November 17, 1993, General Sani Abacha, the dark-goggled despot, pushed aside the interim charade and declared himself absolute ruler. Decrees became law. Fear became policy. Nigeria became a vast prison yard, and every home became a potential cell.

We had a choice: to submit or to resist. We chose resistance.

*II. The Vanguards of the People: The Architecture of Resistance*

Tyranny always creates its gravediggers.

The resistance was not spontaneous; it was organized and focused. It had architecture, ideology, direction, vanguards, and from phase to phase.

The Campaign for Democracy (CD) was the militant, mass-based engine of street confrontation. We believed that democracy is not negotiated in banquet halls; it is won on the streets.

The Committee for the Defence of Human Rights (CDHR) was the ideological and legal backbone. It gave political defence to the defenceless and taught that human rights are not charity but class struggle.

When the need for a broader unity became urgent, the United Action for Democracy (UAD) emerged as the united front - welding CD, CDHR, student unions, labour, professional groups and market associations into a single fist.

And the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO) became the broad historic bloc of the political class, elders and progressives, both inside and outside exile, demanding the restoration of June 12.

We were not civil society in the donor sense. We were the combatants of civil society. We were the Vanguards of the People.

*III. The Chain of Comradeship: From Saro-Wiwa to Iyayi*

A movement is only as strong as the continuity of its cadres.

Comrade Ken Saro-Wiwa was not just an Ogoni leader. He was our National Vice Chairman (South-South) in the Campaign for Democracy. A poet who weaponized the pen. He linked the oil spill in the Niger Delta to the moral spill in Dodan Barracks. He internationalized our local struggle.

When the junta, using a compromised judiciary and a kangaroo tribunal led by Justice Ibrahim Auta primitively convicted and later hanged Ken Saro-Wiwa and the Ogoni 8 on November 10, 1995, they thought they were killing a man. They were killing their own legitimacy before the world.

The mantle fell, and it did not fall. It was lifted by a giant - Professor Festus Iyayi. Former President of ASUU. National President of CDHR. Marxist, novelist, organizer. Prof. Iyayi proved that the intellectual who does not join the street has betrayed his books. He succeeded Comrade Saro-Wiwa as the South Zone of the Campaign for Democracy and brought theoretical depth and uncompromising courage to the leadership.

From Saro-Wiwa to Iyayi, the line was clear: the struggle for democracy and the struggle for social justice are one and the same.

*IV. The Mass Resistance: How Nigerians Were Conscientized*

This is the chapter bourgeois writers erase.

They write about leaders, but not about the masses. Yet without the masses, we were nothing.

We went from community to community. From town hall to town hall. From student campus to campus. We did sensitization. We did conscientization in the Freirean sense - we made people see that their personal hunger was political.

And Nigerians listened. Oh, they listened!

*V. The Barricades and Trenches: The Battles Were Tough*

The battle was fought on the streets, in the markets, at the motor parks, and at midnight with a printing machine that could cost us our lives.

Leafleteering and grafty was our artillery.

We did not have NTA or Radio Nigeria. Abacha had them. We had paper. We had ink. We had courage.

We produced leaflets, bulletins, and communiques - sometimes handwritten, sometimes cyclostyled in hidden rooms - all across the country. We called it conscientization material. The junta called it sedition.

How did it move?

We partnered with the Newspapers Distributors Association of Nigeria (NDAN). Those comrades were heroes. They knew every vendor, every route. Our leaflets entered inside newspapers. A citizen buying Daily Times would find our call to action inside. That was our internet.

The Market Associations were our distribution centres. The Iyaloja and Babaloja who believed in June 12 opened their stalls to us.

The Student Union Governments (SUGs) were our ready Field Commanders. From Unilorin to ABU Zaria, from UNILAG to UNN, they took the bundles and spread them from hostel to hostel. They were fearless.

The Labour and factory cadres carried them into the factories, into the industrial estates in Ilorin, Kano and Lagos.

The Akara (bean cake) sellers - yes, our mothers - wrapped akara with our leaflets. Who would suspect an akara seller?

The Drivers' Unions - NURTW, RTEAN - were our logistics corps. They transported our materials from town to town, and village to village, inside engine compartments, under seats, inside spare tyres. A driver could be our cadre without ever shouting Aluta.

And I must record this for history: The Catholic Bishops Conference of Nigeria were consistent allies. While others kept quiet, their communiques eased the tension in society. They were consistently progressive. Their pastoral letters gave moral legitimacy to what we were saying on the streets.

But the barricades had blood.

Many Nigerians lost their lives at the barricades due to police and military extrajudicial killings.

 We watched many fall by our sides through bullets.

We carried comrades who were shot for holding a leaflet. We saw market women beaten for shouting "June 12". We saw students gunned down for mounting a barricade.

The battles were tough. But every bullet that killed a comrade produced ten more.

 Every barricade they dismantled in the morning, we rebuilt in the night.

That was the spirit of the barricades.

*VI. The Plateau Zone and Our Unsung Heroes*

It is expedient and germane for me to pause here and express my sincere condolences and love for our late Comrades, Basil Chianson and Peter Ogaba of the Nigerian Airways.

History must record this: the duo played unquantifiable roles in the struggles and in my leadership team especially in the Benue and Plateau axis.

They were not just sympathizers. They were logistics commanders. Nigerian Airways staff at that time had access, had movement, had networks across the country. Basil and Peter used their positions to move our mobilisation materials, to give us cover, to provide safe passage and information. In the dangerous terrain of Benue and Plateau, they were our wings.

Their death is a monumental loss to the democratic struggle. Their names must be etched in gold whenever the story of June 12 is told in the Middle Belt. May their militant Souls continue to live.

I salute them.

*VII. Close Calls: The Makurdi Escape and The Mystic Shield*

In this kind of struggle, you live many lives in one day.

I remember one of my most dangerous escapes in Benue, Makurdi. I had made the usual trips across the Plateau Zone which I coordinated to strengthen the zone and deliver mobilisation materials. 

On that particular trip, my mission was to formally constitute a strong CD Branch in Benue.

In that historic meeting, Comrade Samuel Ortom (NOW FORMER GOVERNOR OF BENUE STATE):and Comrade Abubakar Borjov were elected Chairman and Secretary respectively. The zone was now solid.

It was time to go to Jos in continuation of my trip. Getting to the motor park in the morning, our vehicle was loaded. I thought we were heading to Jos unhindered.

To my surprise, our vehicle parked just outside the garage and the driver said, "Please everybody come down for police check."

The previous day, the State Security Service (SSS) had traced me to the office of NULGE for my arrest. They had gotten wind that I was in Makurdi. Comrade Sanni of NULGE and others were hosting me. I had escaped that arrest by whiskers.

Now this checkpoint. When I saw plain clothed policemen, hot blood ran through my spine, and all over my body. 

I composed myself for another arrest. I became determined that no matter what happened, I was ready to pay the price.

What happened next, I owe to the ECK Masters of the Order of Vairagi. 

Three ECK Masters stepped in at that garage. For the Spiritual Law of Silence, I keep that part of the story sealed.

I had many similar escapes in that era. Each one reminded me that the struggle is both physical and spiritual.

Baraka Bashad.

*VIII. Five Minutes Away From The Phantom Coup: Patrick Aziza's Panel*

The junta was not just hunting us; it was framing us.

My escrow account campaign - demanding that Nigeria's crude oil revenue be DEPOSITED IN AN ESCROW ACCOUNT for the Nigerian people - had penetrated into the junta's fabrics. I had touched their loot. I was therefore to be either eliminated or given life imprisonment.

Their plan was to rope me into General Patrick Aziza's Phantom Coup Panel.

This was premeditated. The junta's excuse for wanting to rope me into a coup was linked to the junta's self-styled violence across the country. Ilorin, Kwara State was one of the first places the junta's dark agents planted and detonated bombs. They were negatively portraying activists as people behind the violence, to justify crushing us.

Our Chairman, Dr. Beko Ransome-Kuti and Comrade Shehu Sani who was coordinating Kaduna Zone were already arrested and in prison to be linked to this phantom coup.

I was next.

Again, to the credit of my INNER MASTER, I was STERNLY WARNED to vacate the Safe House I was staying at the time.

I had to open up to my host because he had provided cover to me when it mattered most. I told him,

 "Look, my Inner Master whispered to me to leave your house within 5 minutes or I will be arrested to a point of no return."

I have always packed my bag ready for any emergency.

Sadly, my host insisted on taking his bath before leaving the house.

Within that 5 minutes window, they struck.

 He was arrested and spent about three weeks at the State Security Service (SSS) detention center. He paid the price for his solidarity.

I escaped by 5 minutes. Five minutes between freedom and a phantom coup tribunal that would have ended my life.

*IX. May 6, 1994 and the Triumph of Collective Leadership*

I and Late Dr. Frederick Fasheun were the first casualties of Abacha's terror on the 6th of May 1994. While preparing for the mass street protests and burn fires slated for Monday 9th May, we were arrested. Abacha was in Ilorin for the All Military Games, and his security apparatus wanted to preempt us.

They thought if they cut the head, the body would die.

But IVhad been schooled by the Legendary, Comrade Baba Omojola, in the COMMITTEE SYSTEM OF LEADERSHIP.

The struggle was not built around me. It was decentralized. Every cell had its own autonomy.

So inside detention, I was jubilating. My esteemed comrades carried out the protests and the burn fires effectively without me. That is the beauty of collective structures. Individuals may be detained, but an idea organized cannot be imprisoned.

I Was charged "Security Risk against the Head of Srate and Commander-In-Chief (C-in-C).

*X. The VOA Campaign and Becoming WANTED: DEAD OR ALIVE*

The judicial murder of Ken Saro-Wiwa radicalized me further.

I was being interviewed regularly by William Eagle of the Voice of America (VOA). I decided to escalate the ideological warfare. I used that global platform to campaign for Nigeria's crude oil revenue to be DEPOSITED IN AN ESCROW ACCOUNT - to be held in trust for the Nigerian people, outside the thieving reach of the Abacha junta.

That single campaign touched the jugular of the regime. They could tolerate political abuse; they could not tolerate a threat to their loot.

I was declared wanted. A combined team of military intelligence and MOPOL was dispatched from Abuja with a clear order: bring him DEAD OR ALIVE.

*XI. 17 Grueling Months: The Tramp With No Home*

I permanently left my home for 17 grueling months. Until Abacha transited to a higher realm of existence.

I became a tramp with nowhere to lay my head. A nomad in my own country. From ONE SAFE HOUSE TO ANOTHER.

I became persona non grata to many friends and relatives. Fear made them distance themselves. I do not blame them; tyranny makes cowards of many.

But VERY FEW STOOD SOLIDLY FOR ME.

 They opened their doors when the state had marked my me. They are the true HEROINES AND HEROES OF OUR COLLECTIVE STRUCTURES.

The cost was not mine alone. My own sister was arrested 26 times between 1994 and 1998 in lieu of me. Twenty-six times!

 We had to organize to smuggle her out of Kwara State into safety until the tyrant fell.

They risked everything for the struggle.

*CODWA: Why We Still Struggle*

I tell this story not for pity. I tell it for continuity.

From the struggle against military tyranny to the struggle against economic tyranny today, it is the same fight.

We moved from the barricades to the ballot, from burn fires to budgets, but the weapon remains the same: ORGANIZED COLLECTIVE STRUCTURES OF THE PEOPLE.

We remain unbowed. We remain unconquered.

It is not yet UHURU

Vigilance is the Price for Eternal Liberty 

VICTORIA AETERNA 

COMRADE TAIWO OMONIYI OTITOLAYE is the Executive Director of Community Outreach for Development and Welfare Advocacy (CODWA)

Wednesday, 30 September 2026

GAFAMORG Seeks Nigerians’ Voices on Wages, Living Standards and Economic Dignity

 LAGOS — The Gani Fawehinmi Memorial Organization (GAFAMORG) has launched the People’s Living Dignity Test 2026, a nationwide public evidence gathering exercise aimed at documenting the real life economic conditions and cost of living experiences of Nigerians.

The initiative, launched on September 29, 2026, seeks responses from Nigerians across the 36 states of the federation and the Federal Capital Territory on their everyday economic circumstances and what it takes to maintain a basic standard of living with dignity.

According to GAFAMORG, the exercise is intended to bring citizens’ direct experiences into public discussions about wages, living standards and the rising cost of living.

The organisation said the questionnaire provides a structured platform through which Nigerians can share evidence of their present economic circumstances, adding that the information gathered would contribute to continuing public interest documentation on wages, living standards, economic dignity and social justice.

Nigerians urged to participate

GAFAMORG has urged Nigerians to complete the questionnaire honestly and base their responses on their current personal circumstances.

The organisation is also calling on individuals and organisations to circulate the questionnaire widely through communities, workplaces, trade union and workers’ networks, churches, mosques, youth organisations, student groups, community associations and social-media platforms.

It specifically appealed to journalists, civil-society organisations, community leaders and other public interest institutions to help bring the exercise to Nigerians who might otherwise have limited opportunities to participate.

GAFAMORG said the objective is to generate people centred evidence rather than merely opinions on the economic realities confronting citizens.

The organisation said relevant findings would be communicated to the public as responses are compiled and analysed.

Explaining the philosophy behind the initiative, GAFAMORG said: “The people should not merely be discussed. The people should also be heard.”

The organisation described the exercise as part of its continuing public interest work under the banner: “Remembering Gani by Continuing His Struggle.”

The statement was signed by the Chairman, Comrade Babatunde Agunbiade, and the Public Relations Officer, Comrade Ade Adeoye Adewunmi, on behalf of GAFAMORG.

How to participate

Members of the public can take the People’s Living Dignity Test 2026 through the GAFAMORG questionnaire:

Take the People's Living Dignity Test 2026

The exercise is open to Nigerians across the country.

Saturday, 26 September 2026

FROM “CHRISTIAN GENOCIDE” TO “MINERAL WEALTH”: THE IMPERIALIST AGENDA BEHIND US ENGAGEMENT WITH NIGERIA

 The article argues that Africa's historical experience with Western powers should make Africans cautious about accepting claims that foreign intervention is motivated solely by humanitarian, religious or security concerns. It draws a direct historical line from colonialism, when European powers invoked civilisation and Christianity while extracting African labour and resources, to contemporary forms of political and economic influence. The writer's central premise is that military, diplomatic and economic engagements with Africa should be examined within the wider context of geopolitical interests and resource competition.

The article then connects the United States' designation of Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern over religious-freedom issues and the December 2025 US airstrikes against ISIS linked targets in Sokoto with the subsequent September 2026 US-Nigeria mineral sector framework. The writer highlights Nigeria's estimated $700 billion mineral wealth and argues that the timing and combination of religious, military and economic engagement warrant closer scrutiny. 

A major argument concerns neocolonialism and the Tinubu administration. The writer interprets increased American engagement with Nigeria's mineral resources as potentially representing a strategic concession to US interests. He further raises the possibility that economic and diplomatic arrangements could create international tolerance for democratic or human-rights violations by the Nigerian government, particularly in the context of the 2027 elections. The article connects this concern to the government's handling of the #EndBadGovernanceInNigeria protests, allegations of excessive force and the prosecution of protesters under serious charges.

The broader political argument is that economic sovereignty is inseparable from political sovereignty. According to the writer, genuine independence requires African countries to control how their natural resources are developed, how their economies are structured and whose interests influence national policy. He therefore rejects reliance on imperial powers for security, finance, technology, knowledge or resource development and argues that foreign investment should be interrogated rather than automatically equated with development.

Finally, the article is fundamentally a call for political education and historical consciousness. Its recurring message is that Africans must study slavery, colonialism, the Scramble for Africa, neocolonialism, resource exploitation and the interaction between religion and geopolitical power. The writer concludes that Africa's liberation cannot be outsourced and that a new generation must understand the structural relationships that sustain external dependence. The article therefore combines a historical critique of imperialism with a contemporary political argument about Nigeria's resources, sovereignty, democracy and foreign relations.

26TH SEPTEMBER 2026

FROM “CHRISTIAN GENOCIDE” TO MINERAL WEALTH: HOW TRUMP’S US IMPERIALISM TARGETED NIGERIA’S UNTAPPED RESOURCES THROUGH THE TINUBU NEO-COLONIAL REGIME

Generation after generation, Africans have failed to adequately study their own history, and consequently, generation after generation continues to become a victim of history.

THE PATTERN IS NOT NEW

The colonial masters came to Africa claiming to bring civilisation, Christianity and progress to our forefathers. Behind the language of civilisation was the violent reality of conquest, slavery, exploitation and the systematic extraction of Africa's human and natural resources. The consequences of that colonial relationship continue to shape our continent today, even as millions of Africans remain trapped in poverty and deprivation.

We must therefore be careful whenever powerful foreign governments present military intervention, religious protection or humanitarian concern as the principal motivation for their involvement in Africa.

In 2025, President Donald Trump placed Nigeria on the United States' list of Countries of Particular Concern over religious-freedom concerns and repeatedly spoke about the persecution of Christians. On December 25, 2025, the United States carried out airstrikes against ISIS-linked targets in Sokoto State, in coordination with the Nigerian government. The United States claimed that multiple ISIS militants were killed in the operation. However, rather than producing a significant improvement in the country's security situation, the security crisis has continued, with violence and insecurity remaining widespread and, in some areas, worsening.

My political interpretation is that Africans must not look at such developments in isolation. We must examine them against the broader history of imperialism, geopolitical interests and the competition for Africa's strategic resources.

And now, in September 2026, Nigeria and the United States have signed a framework aimed at attracting American investment into Nigeria's mineral sector, which the Nigerian government estimates at about $700 billion. The framework covers geological data and exploration, mineral development and processing, infrastructure and technical capacity.

For me, this raises a fundamental question: What lessons have we learnt from history?

History teaches us that foreign powers rarely engage with Africa without pursuing their own strategic and economic interests.

Unfortunately, many Africans, including religious extremists and sections of the political class, celebrated the rhetoric of foreign intervention without sufficiently interrogating the historical pattern of imperialism and resource extraction. This is why I believe we need less obsession with social-media noise and more serious political education.

AFRICANS MUST READ AFRICAN HISTORY

We must study colonialism. We must study slavery. We must study the scramble for Africa. We must study neocolonialism. We must study how Africa's natural resources have historically been exploited and we must understand how religion, military power, diplomacy and economic interests have sometimes interacted in the pursuit of geopolitical objectives.

History continues to repeat itself when societies refuse to learn from it, and too often, the victims remain the same.

My political interpretation of these neocolonial transactions is that they may represent a strategic concession by the Tinubu regime to US imperialism, potentially aimed at securing the silence or acquiescence of a global power ahead of the forthcoming election. It raises the concern that such an arrangement could be intended to create diplomatic cover for the regime should it attempt to manipulate the election or unleash brutal repression against citizens who may resist electoral malpractice or protest worsening economic hardship.

This concern cannot be divorced from the government's response to the #EndBadGovernanceInNigeria protests, when security forces were accused of using excessive and deadly force against protesters, while others who protested against hunger and economic hardship were arrested and prosecuted on serious charges, including treason. Critics have also argued that international powers largely failed to exert meaningful pressure on the Tinubu administration over these developments, at a time when the government was implementing far-reaching neoliberal economic policies.

From my perspective, this raises a broader question about the relationship between imperial interests and democratic accountability: when a government adopts policies that deepen economic dependence and open the country's resources and markets to powerful foreign interests, do those same foreign powers have an incentive to overlook violations of democratic and human rights when their strategic and economic interests are being protected?

This is precisely why Africans must interrogate neocolonial relationships beyond the language of investment, partnership and development. True sovereignty requires not merely political independence, but the economic freedom to determine how our resources are developed, how our economy is structured and whose interests ultimately determine the direction of our society.

That is why the struggle for democracy and sovereignty cannot depend on the goodwill of imperial powers. We must completely break from imperial dependency.

Africa needs a generation equipped with political education, not merely social-media opinions; a generation capable of understanding the relationship between power, economics, history, religion and imperialism.

We must raise young Africans who understand that the struggle for genuine sovereignty is not simply about changing political leaders. It is about transforming the structures that keep Africa dependent on external powers for security, technology, finance, knowledge and the development of its own natural resources.

Africa must also free itself from religious colonialism, the mindset that makes Africans believe that salvation, civilisation or protection must come from foreign powers. Our liberation cannot be outsourced.

Africa must study its history, understand its present and fight for control of its future. The continent must break free from imperialism, neocolonialism and every form of external dominance, political, economic, cultural and religious.

Francis Nwapa

Socialist Activist and Human Rights Advocate

Thursday, 24 September 2026

Media Must Not Choose Nigeria’s Candidates for 2027 Elections — Mẹkunnu Kọya

LAGOS — The Convener of Mẹkunnu Kọya, Comrade Wale Balogun, has called on Nigerian media organisations to ensure equitable and inclusive coverage of all candidates contesting the 2027 presidential, National Assembly, governorship and State House of Assembly elections.

Balogun, in a statement issued on Thursday, warned that disproportionate media attention to a small number of prominent political figures could restrict the democratic choices available to Nigerian voters.

He acknowledged the responsibility of the media to scrutinise established political figures, including their records, policies and controversies, but argued that media organisations should not, through selective coverage, determine which candidates Nigerians get to hear and consider.

According to him, all candidates should be given meaningful opportunities to present their programmes, explain their records and respond to questions on issues affecting the country.

He particularly criticised the practice of organising political debates and inviting only a limited number of candidates without sufficiently transparent and inclusive criteria.

“If the purpose of a debate is to help Nigerians make an informed decision, then the process should be genuinely inclusive,” Balogun said.

He argued that candidates with limited financial resources, political structures or name recognition should not automatically be excluded from national political discourse.

Balogun said the media's democratic responsibility should include exposing voters to political alternatives rather than concentrating attention on candidates who are already prominent within the political establishment.

He urged journalists and media organisations to subject candidates across the political spectrum to rigorous questioning on the economy, insecurity, corruption, unemployment, wages, education, healthcare, constitutional reform, federalism and public debt.

He also called for scrutiny of candidates' records, policy proposals, sources of campaign funding and their capacity to implement their promises.

“This is not a demand for favourable coverage of any candidate. It is a demand for fair and inclusive coverage,” he said.

Balogun maintained that Nigerians should be allowed to assess candidates on the basis of their records, programmes and responses to public scrutiny rather than having the media determine in advance who should be regarded as a serious contender.

He therefore called on media organisations to provide equitable opportunities for candidates to participate in interviews, debates, town-hall meetings and other election-related programmes, subject to reasonable and transparent editorial criteria.

“Let every candidate be heard. Let every record be examined. Let every programme be interrogated. Then let Nigerians decide,” he said.

Balogun said the media had a significant responsibility ahead of the 2027 elections to either expand public access to political choices or inadvertently narrow the democratic space through selective coverage.

He stressed that the choice of Nigeria's elected representatives ultimately belongs to the electorate and not to media organisations.

Comrade Wale Balogun
Convener, Mẹkunnu Kọya
September 24, 2026

Monday, 21 September 2026

Civil Society Coalition Demands Immediate Release of Detained Rights Activist Daniel Ezekiel

 

LAGOS, September 21, 2026 — A coalition of civil society organisations, human rights groups and community advocates has demanded the immediate and unconditional release of Niger Delta rights activist Daniel Ezekiel, while calling for an independent investigation into serious allegations he reportedly made against powerful individuals and entities operating in the region.

The coalition, in a statement issued on Monday, said Ezekiel was allegedly taken from his residence in Life Camp, Abuja, on Friday, September 18, by men whose identities and authority he could not verify.

According to the coalition, Ezekiel was subsequently held at the Agwa Cement Police Station before being transferred to the Force Criminal Investigation Department (Force CID) in Abuja.

It said no charge had been publicly disclosed as of the date of the statement and called on the Nigeria Police Force to clarify the legal basis for the arrest.

The coalition linked the arrest to a petition dated September 3, 2026, reportedly submitted by lawyers representing businessman Chief Ekomieyefa Uduboh to the Inspector-General of Police and the National Cybercrime Centre.

The petition reportedly accused Ezekiel and another individual of publishing defamatory posts on Facebook in late August. The coalition stressed that the allegations contained in the petition remain untested and that Ezekiel is entitled to the presumption of innocence.

However, the groups said the arrest had raised broader concerns because Ezekiel had, for several months, publicly alleged that he witnessed unlawful detention, torture, forced labour and intimidation involving Chief Government Ekpemupolo, popularly known as Tompolo, and individuals he alleged were linked to him and Tantita Security Services Nigeria Limited.

The coalition said Ezekiel had submitted petitions to security agencies, government institutions and national and international human rights organisations, alleging the existence of facilities in the Niger Delta where, according to his claims, torture, extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances and forced labour occurred.

It said Ezekiel had reportedly supported his allegations with photographs, audio and video recordings, as well as testimonies from alleged victims and their families.

The coalition stressed that the allegations had not been established by a competent investigative authority and therefore called for an impartial investigation rather than allowing the matter to remain unresolved.

“When a whistleblower is detained before the allegations he raised are examined, the public is left to ask whose interests the system is protecting,” said Juwon Sanwolu, Coordinator of the Take It Back Movement (TIB), speaking on behalf of the coalition.

Rights and Due Process Concerns

The coalition cited Section 35 of the 1999 Constitution, the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights as legal protections against arbitrary detention.

It argued that the reported circumstances surrounding Ezekiel's arrest, including the alleged involvement of unidentified men and his subsequent transfers between police facilities, required clarification.

The groups also raised concerns about the use of cybercrime laws in cases involving allegations of defamation and criticism, arguing that such prosecutions could have implications for freedom of expression.

They cited Section 39 of the Nigerian Constitution and Article 19 of the ICCPR, while referring to previous decisions of the ECOWAS Court of Justice concerning Nigeria's cyberstalking provisions.

The coalition said the police and other security agencies should not become instruments for resolving private disputes or intimidating human rights defenders.

Five Demands

The organisations demanded that the Nigeria Police Force immediately release Ezekiel and publicly disclose the legal basis for his arrest.

They also called on the Inspector-General of Police to identify the officers involved and disclose the police unit handling the petition against him.

In addition, the coalition demanded immediate access to lawyers and family members for Ezekiel, appropriate medical attention where necessary, and guarantees for his physical safety.

It further called on the Federal Government, through the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice and the National Human Rights Commission, to facilitate an independent and impartial investigation into the allegations of torture, unlawful detention and forced labour reportedly raised by Ezekiel.

The coalition also urged all parties involved in the dispute to submit to lawful and transparent investigative processes.

It said it would continue to monitor the matter and could petition or activate relevant international mechanisms, including United Nations and African human rights institutions, if Ezekiel remained detained and the allegations were not investigated.

The statement was endorsed by 57 civil society, human rights, legal, development and community organisations, including Take It Back Movement, Sterling Law Centre, Lawyers Without Borders Nigeria, Amnesty International Nigeria, Committee for the Defence of Human Rights (CDHR), Civil Liberties Organisation (CLO), United Action for Democracy (UAD), Access to Justice, Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD), International Press Centre (IPC), Centre for Environment, Human Rights and Development (CEHRD), Network on Police Reform in Nigeria and several other organisations.

The allegations against the individuals and organisations named by Ezekiel remain subject to investigation and due process.